tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post3153764706075034353..comments2023-11-02T10:26:03.867-05:00Comments on Three Rivers Fishing Report: Ravenstahl Campaign Signage: City Code Violation or Ethics Board ReferralSkiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16611392939372698371noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-48884708229462653232010-08-23T08:26:42.186-05:002010-08-23T08:26:42.186-05:00hi every person,
I identified threeriversfishing...hi every person, <br /><br />I identified threeriversfishing.blogspot.com after previous months and I'm very excited much to commence participating. I are basically lurking for the last month but figured I would be joining and sign up.<br /><br />I am from Spain so please forgave my speaking english[url=http://latestnewsur.info/forum].[/url][url=http://trendytopicsim.info/forum].[/url][url=http://sportsnewser.info/].[/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-57287359498888632532007-05-04T13:02:00.000-05:002007-05-04T13:02:00.000-05:00why have rules if we don't enforce them?why have rules if we don't enforce them?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-31002346756485681182007-04-26T01:32:00.000-05:002007-04-26T01:32:00.000-05:00Generally the DPW workers are pretty even across t...Generally the DPW workers are pretty even across the board no matter which candidates they support in the booth. It is my experience with city campaigns that signs planted in the public right of ways will be removed.<BR/><BR/>No one from the Ravenstahl campaign offically put those signs there and would never ever endorse anyone putting them in spots that are considered illegal.<BR/><BR/>It's very hard for campaigns to police where the signs go after they leave the HQ. Anyone can really put a sign where they want to. Anti-Ravenstahl people can collect signs and go put them in illeagl spots hoping the campaign gets hit with fines. <BR/><BR/>Every person running for office will have signs in spots where they shouldn't be placed. I don't believe it is the candidate's fault in these instances. It's just a matter of people putting the signs in bad spots trying to be helpful and not knowing any better.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-8417881786086887062007-04-25T08:15:00.000-05:002007-04-25T08:15:00.000-05:00Ed, you're probably right. The signs on the vacan...Ed, you're probably right. The signs on the vacant property on Centre and on the "URA" property on Herron don't seem to fall within this law, as you point out. However, maybe someone else is aware of another city code that prevents the posting of campaign material on either abandoned or city-owned property. Something about doing that doesn't seem right, if not legally than ethically. <BR/>Another thought - What do you think would have happened if it were Peduto signs on these properties?Skiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16611392939372698371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-6299607820927547562007-04-25T07:03:00.000-05:002007-04-25T07:03:00.000-05:00Not to be dense, but this is the section that lays...Not to be dense, but this is the section that lays out where it is illegal to put signs: <BR/><BR/>§ 423.03 SIGNS PROHIBITED. <BR/>Unless a permit has been issued and is valid in accordance with the provisions elsewhere in this Code, all signs are prohibited from: <BR/>(a) The area within the right-of-way lines of all public streets, sidewalks, boulevards, highways, avenues, alleys, roads, or other public ways (the area within the right-of-way lines includes unpaved areas); and <BR/>(b) Any utility poles or structures within the right-of-way lines. <BR/>(Ord. 4-1998, eff. 3-16-98) <BR/><BR/>Maybe there is something in the “elsewhere in this Code”, but I didn’t see it in the excerpt you hyperlinked. I ‘m fine with following the law, but where is the part about municipal or vacant land? Am I misreading “right-of-way”?EdHeathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09109361235271107574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-79306678980461511152007-04-24T19:03:00.000-05:002007-04-24T19:03:00.000-05:00Yeah, I could have done a better job with the post...Yeah, I could have done a better job with the post but I was pretty sure that campaign signs on public property, along city roads, was illegal according to city code. I was fairly surprised to see so many flagrant violations of such a law. <BR/>The candidate is still responsible for the well-intentioned work of enterprising volunteers. <BR/><BR/>While I believe that property is owned by the URA, according to the county assessment site, I'm not certain. It's difficult to identify an address for that property but much of the property around it on the 500-600 block of Herron is owned by the URA. Remember that both Ferlo and Zober sit on the URA board. Maybe in late-May they'll announce that this property will become Ravenstahl Park.Skiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16611392939372698371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2624170524603305147.post-7683921562074666082007-04-24T16:55:00.000-05:002007-04-24T16:55:00.000-05:00I wasn't with you, really (enterprising volunteers...I wasn't with you, really (enterprising volunteers will lust after plum little patches of real estate) until you got to the Herron and Centre site that you say is owned by the U.R.A. That was quite a display. Whatever Team Luke decides to do, the U.R.A. should put some signs up in late may detailing just what their plans are for that property.Bram Reichbaumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05620172942925293407noreply@blogger.com